Skip to content
main navigation
Login
Username
Password
I forgot my password
Search
Search
Search
Home
Student Success Center
Admissions
Fast Track
Library
Online Help
You are here:
Academics
Business - BUS
Business Communications
BUS 368 FT 2 - Business Communications
Blog 1
Main screen
Edit a post
Current view: Course Administrator
View as: Faculty
View as: Students
View this screen as a student
BUS 368 FT 2 - Business Communications
Menu
Quick Links
Main Page
Blog 1
Course Faculty
Course Schedule/Syllabus
Course Text
Collaboration]]]]]]]]]
Coursework
Gradebook
Attendance
Week One: 2/13-2/19
Week Two: 2/20-2/26
Week Three: 2/27-3/5]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
Week Four: 3/6-3/12
Week Five: 3/13-3/19
Mytalladega Support ]]]]]]]]]
BUS 368 FT 25
All My Courses
All About Vape
Blog
Blog 2
Blog 3
NEW
NEWINDEXIN
IGET Bar
Blog 4
Add a Page
Course Manager
Usage Statistics
Quick Links
Federal Student Aid Net Price Calculator
Student Email
Faculty/Staff Email
Talladega College
Sidebar
Blog 1
Send to Printer
Help
Preferences
Access
Options
Settings
MoxieManager
Blog 1
Edit a post
 
Content
Options
Headline:
Choose priority option
Priority:
Regular
High
Text:
<p dir="ltr">Politicians who confront opponents within the domain of public conversations recognize certain rhetorical elements to be efficient and persuasive in conveying a particular message. Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter had a debate regarding the matter of nuclear safety and necessary political regulations. Both Reagan and Carter presented their opinions on the situation, and ways to resolve a possible conflict between two states. In order to express their thoughts and feelings clearly, the speakers implemented such rhetorical means as examples and analogies. It may be stated that the chosen figures of speech make it more vivid, enable the speaker to articulate his or her views explicitly and convince the audience. The paper focuses on these items of figurative language and evaluates their effectiveness as written in <a href="https://best-essays-sites.com/review/samedayessay-reviews-sort-out-the-wheat-from-the-chaff.html">samedayessay reviews</a>.</p> <p dir="ltr">In order to analyze examples and analogies, these terms have to be defined. Examples are specific facts, ideas, or things that are used to illustrate or support a case. They appeal to the general audience as they emphasize a thought using a familiar and recognizable situation that is referred to by the speaker. Analogies are drawn to make a comparison between ideas, people, or things. These literal parallels are built on associations. Therefore, analogies may receive emotional responses and are effective when explaining a subject. It should be noted that analogies are applied to simplify the matter in hand, while examples are used to communicate the message and explain its main features. Additionally, examples and analogies help to develop a perspective and view it from different angles. In order to succeed, examples and analogies have to be relevant and develop a topic under discussion.</p> <p dir="ltr">This example is introduced to stress the importance of the question under consideration and influence the voters’ decision formed by the debate. It is not enough to refer to the nuclear weapon as a dangerous thing and Carter wants people to understand the scope of the threat. Such an approach presents a persuasive piece of evidence as it focuses on nuclear weapons as a formidable force implying that certain actions need to be taken to avoid such negative consequences.</p> <p dir="ltr">This example was a means used to refute Reagan’s analogy which was the following: “I sometimes think that he’s like the witch doctor that gets mad when a good doctor comes along with a cure that’ll work.” Here, there is a contrast between the notions of good and evil that implies that the actions of Carter are impractical and bring no results. Reagan understands that he and Carter cannot both be right and tries to discredit his opponent and lower his level of authority. In this case, the analogy achieves the desired effect as it also focuses on the idea that Reagan’s methods will work just as a cure of a good doctor.</p> <p dir="ltr">The analyzed example and analogy are the forms of rhetorical figures that are used to make a speech more persuasive and convince the opponent. Examples and analogies are incorporated to illustrate the major ideas. If properly used, these two elements explain the matter in hand and make people comprehend complicated thoughts. Reagan and Carter managed to implement examples and analogies into their speeches and to some extent invalidate the thoughts of the opponent. It should be mentioned that, without these means of figurative language, their debate would not have been so intense and productive.</p> <p> </p>
Comments:
Enable Comments
Attribution:
Include your name as the author
Show to:
Context
:
BUS 368 FT 2 - Business Communications
All users in BUS 368 FT 2 - Business Communications
Faculty
Students
Select a base role
Base roles
All users
Include guests
<<
A-F
G-Z
>>
Administrators
Admissions Administrators
Admissions Counselors
Admissions Officers
Admissions page admin
Advancement Officers
Advisor Administrators
Advisors
Biology Dept.
Biology Portal
Business Office Administrators
Candidates
Check Point Users
Coaches
Constituents
Covid 19 Students
Employment Applicant
Faculty
Fast Track admin
Fast Track Students
Financial Aid Administrators
HR Module Manager
Library Admin
Login Form Test Group
PR
Reg Admin
Retention faculty
Retention Managers
Sandbox tab admins
Staff
Staff Administrators
Staff Retention Manager
Student Administrators
Student Life Admins
Students
When:
Select a start and end date and time
Start:
Start:
Display immediately
Display on
Pick Start Date
at
Enter a time
End:
End:
Keep in Archive
Delete on:
Pick End Date
at
Enter a time